Beatles or Stones?

[tovo]

It's said that you are either a Beatles or Stones person. I guess there must be one or 2 who are neither...but it beggars belief. Anyway...which are you? Tell us why.

[TGMatt]

You should turn this into a Poll tony...

[tovo]

You know I haven't figured out how to yet!

[Chasplaya]

tovo wrote:

You know I haven't figured out how to yet!

My thread/Poll on same topic
Sorry mate couldn't resist, I actually didn't really mean to post it, I went to check out how to create a Poll to let you know and force of habit I guess pushed submit.

Anyway I voted as both, slightly leaning more to the Stones though.

[tovo]

OK Chas was helping me out and fixed up a poll on the subject, so Go over there and vote and tell us why you voted the way you did. Cheers.

[suziko]

I went with both. I like the Beatles when I'm in a sweet mood, the Stones when I'm feeling raunchy.

[AndyT]

Suzi feeling raunchy? This does not compute!

[suziko]

I don't let my raunchy side out to play all that often, Andy, but it is there.

[smilinsteve]

Beatles! They started it all....didnt they?, As far as I was concerned I saw them first on Ed Sullivan....They were "nicer", their melodies were catchier, and that was that !

[cosmicmechanic]

I voted Beatles. Because I'm right!

I justify this by the fact that over the years I've been lucky to have witnessed a few encyclopedic Beatles-playing guitarists drop by a party or campfire somewhere, but never once a has a walking Stones jukebox wandered into any of those. I guess this is because although most of us like to listen to the Stones, we would tire of repeating the posturing tough-guy lyrics when attempting to learn to play a lot of their repertoire. So more players play more Beatles songs because they are more better!

Pierre