Beatles or Stones

martinibates
Posts: 0
Joined: Thu Nov 12, 2009 6:59 am
Status: Offline

Sat Oct 23, 2010 4:56 am

Both. Always been a Beatles fan. The first single I bought was can't buy me love (yes I am that old, was only 6, I think). But came to the Stones later in life, with some of their more subtle numbers


ffsooo3
Posts: 0
Joined: Sat Mar 21, 2009 6:35 am
Status: Offline

Sat Oct 23, 2010 6:09 am

Beatles: Harmonies, backing vocals (with harmony), melodies, bass lines, arrangements, etc. Their music just makes me happy.


stratman3
Posts: 0
Joined: Sat Mar 21, 2009 4:52 am
Status: Offline

Sat Oct 23, 2010 6:40 am

Yes, the Stones are a great band and have lasted for a long time, but the Beatles are the band of the 20th century. Lennon and McCartney songs a melodies will live on for hundreds of years. they are the Bach and Bethoven of our time.
There is the Beates and then there is everybody else.

Gary B)


jim56
Posts: 0
Joined: Sat Mar 07, 2009 1:29 am
Status: Offline

Sat Oct 23, 2010 6:52 am

I'm with Mark on this one, always been a beatles fan.


willem
Posts: 5
Joined: Fri Mar 20, 2009 7:53 am
Status: Offline

Sat Oct 23, 2010 8:34 am

stratman3 wrote:
Yes, the Stones are a great band and have lasted for a long time, but the Beatles are the band of the 20th century. Lennon and McCartney songs a melodies will live on for hundreds of years. they are the Bach and Bethoven of our time.
There is the Beates and then there is everybody else.

Gary B)
glad to know that They!!! listen to Bach and Beethoven..


User avatar
jcrocket
Posts: 0
Joined: Sat Sep 26, 2009 7:43 pm
Status: Offline

Sat Oct 23, 2010 9:29 am

The Beatles have been a favorite of mine since day one; the Stones were more of an acquired taste for me. I have to go with "both" for my vote at this point.


Post Reply Previous topicNext topic